Insights

Preliminary results and Fire Safety CiC intensity Index (September-October Data)

A joint Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CiC) was launched during autumn for Fire Safety compliance under the following regimes

  • Paris Memorandum of Understanding (Paris MoU)
  • Tokyo Memorandum of Understanding (Tokyo MoU)
  • Black Sea MoU
  • Caribbean MoU
  • Indian Ocean MoU

The Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CiC) aimed to verify compliance with the Fire Safety implementation on board ships. The inspection campaign period lasted from 1st September 2023 to 30th November 2023. This Concentrated Inspection Campaign, was conducted in parallel with regular PSC Inspections, meaning that when a PSCO was boarding a vessel for inspection, apart from the checklist for the regular PSC inspection, followed an additional CiC Checklist, framed by a list of 10 additional questions focusing on CiC subject (Fire Safety).

Please see Annex A for the Inspection Checklist
Please See Annex B for the list of CiC related Deficiency Codes, corresponding to each question
Please See Annex C for the methodology used to calculate the CiC Intensity Index

The following outlines the findings related with CiC per MoU under review for the months of September & October.

MoU Ports with PSCI # PSCIs Sep. & Oct. 23 Total # DEF Sep. & Oct. 23 # CiC DEF Sep. & Oct. 23 % CiC DEF Sep. & Oct. 23 % CiC DEF L12M CiC Intensity Index %
Paris MoU 154 1,509 2,590 651 25% 18% 39%
Tokyo MoU 178 5,302 4,890 1,539 32% 20% 60%
Black Sea 14 517 892 98 11% 13% – 15%
Caribbean 2 34 6 29 21% 22% – 4.5%
Indian Ocean 32 809 730 151 20% 18% 17%

 

Ports with Higher CiC Intensity Index (for Paris, Tokyo and Black Sea MoU)

The following are the Top 10 ports with higher CiC intensity Index for Paris MoU (sorted by Higher CiC Intensity Index).

Port Country # PSCIs Sep. & Oct. 23 Total # DEF Sep. & Oct. 23 # CiC DEF Sep. & Oct. 23 % CiC DEF Sep. & Oct. 23 % CiC DEF L12M CiC Intensity Index %
Klaipeda Lithuania 40 33 6 18% 5% 239%
Amsterdam Netherlands 27 47 21 45% 18% 151.0%
Zeebrugge Belgium 28 23 7 30% 18% 68.2%
Piraeus Greece 57 70 20 29% 18% 61.1%
Bremerhaven Germany 23 23 5 22% 15% 41.6%
Antwerpen Belgium 115 239 59 25% 18% 35.5%
Marseille (GPM) France 43 61 19 31% 24% 30.7%
Ravenna Italy 23 106 15 14% 11% 25.3%
Gent Belgium 23 31 6 19% 16% 23.7%
Rotterdam Netherlands 91 112 29 26% 21% 21.1%

 

The following are the Top 10 ports with higher CiC intensity Index for Tokyo MoU (sorted by Higher CiC Intensity Index)

Port Country # PSCIs Sep. & Oct. 23 Total # DEF Sep. & Oct. 23 # CiC DEF Sep. & Oct. 23 % CiC DEF Sep. & Oct. 23 % CiC DEF L12M CiC Intensity Index %
Qingdao China 105 80 168 76% 22% 116%
Newcastle, NSW Australia 72 17 53 24% 16% 103%
Shanghai China 182 95 264 52% 19% 90%
Busan South Korea 72 22 55 31% 22% 84%
Guangzhou China 108 52 144 48% 20% 83%
Shenzhen China 77 24 68 31% 20% 77%
Dalian China 88 31 92 35% 23% 49%
Hong Kong China 91 39 91 43% 29% 46%
Tianjin China 130 56 175 43% 24% 34%
Haiphong Vietnam 104 18 42 17% 34% 28%

 

The following are the Top 5 ports with higher CiC intensity Index for Black Sea MoU (sorted by Higher CiC Intensity Index)

Port Country # PSCIs Sep. & Oct. 23 Total # DEF Sep. & Oct. 23 # CiC DEF Sep. & Oct. 23 % CiC DEF Sep. & Oct. 23 % CiC DEF L12M CiC Intensity Index %
Izmail Turkey 86 4 2 50.00% 16.05% 211.6%
Taman Russia 69 163 28 17.18% 10.01% 56.0%
Tuapse Romania 44 81 25 30.86% 22.73% 35.8%
Poti Georgia 39 51 6 11.76% 10.04% 17.2%
Novorossiysk Russia 198 386 49 12.69% 10.95% 15.9%

 

Terminology used

PSCI: Port State Control Inspections

DEF: Deficiency

CIC: Concentrated Inspection Campaign

L12M: Last 12 Months

 

Annex A: Fire Safety Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CiC) Questionnaire

The list with the CiC questions is as follows:

No Description Yes No Detention
1. Are the emergency escape routes maintained in a safe condition?
2. Are the fire doors maintained in good working condition?
3. Has the fixed fire detection and fire alarm systems, been periodically tested in accordance with the requirements of the Administration?
4. Are ventilation closing appliances capable of being closed?
5. Are the means of control for power ventilation of machinery spaces operable from two grouped positions?
6. Can each fire pump deliver at least the two required jets of water?
7. Are the means of control provided in a position outside the machinery space for stopping ventilation and oil transfer equipment operational?
8. Is the room for the fixed gas fire extinguishing medium used only for this purpose?
9. Are the valves used in the fire main line operational?
10. Where a fire drill was witnessed, was it found to be satisfactory?

 

All of above items may lead to Detention if the findings are not on the satisfaction of PSCO.

 

Annex B: Fire Safety Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CiC) corresponding Deficiency Codes

Deficiency Codes Related to Inspection Campaign

No Questions and possible findings Related PSC Deficiency Codes
1. Are the emergency escape routes maintained in a safe condition? 07120 – Means of escape
04103 – Emergency, lighting, batteries, and switches
2. Are the fire doors maintained in good working condition? 03107 – Doors
07105 – Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting divisions
07101 – Fire prevention structural integrity
07103 – Division – decks, bulkheads, and penetrations
3. Has the fixed fire detection and fire alarm systems, been periodically tested in accordance with the requirements of the Administration? 07106 – Fire detection and alarm system
07121 – Crew alarm
07108 – Ready availability of firefighting equipment
07109 – Fixed fire extinguishing installation
07110 – Firefighting equipment and appliances
4. Are ventilation closing appliances capable of being closed? 03108 – Ventilators, air pipes, casings
07115 – Fire-dampers
07116 – Ventilation
5. Are the means of control for power ventilation of machinery spaces operable from two grouped positions? 07116 – Ventilation
07114 – Remote Means of control (opening, pumps, ventilation, etc.) Machinery spaces
6. Can each fire pump deliver at least the two required jets of water? 04102 – Emergency fire pump and its pipes
07113 – Fire pumps and its pipes
7. Are the means of control provided in a position outside the machinery space for stopping ventilation and oil transfer equipment operational? 07114 – Remote Means of control (opening, pumps, ventilation, etc.) Machinery spaces
07116 – Ventilation
07122 – Fire control plan
07123 – Operation of Fire protection systems
07124 – Maintenance of Fire protection systems
8. Is the room for the fixed gas fire extinguishing medium used only for this purpose? 07108 – Ready availability of firefighting equipment
07109 – Fixed fire extinguishing installation
07122 – Fire control plan
9. Are the valves used in the fire main line operational? 07108 – Ready availability of firefighting equipment
07110 – Firefighting equipment and appliances
07113 – Fire pumps and its pipes
07123 – Operation of Fire protection systems
07124 – Maintenance of Fire protection systems
10. Where a fire drill was witnessed, was it found to be satisfactory? 04109 – Fire drills
07122 – Fire control plan
07125 – Evaluation of crew performance (fire drills)

 

The listed items if identified as Deficiencies on board, are described by a set of Deficiency Codes (a question may create more than one Deficiency Codes as findings). There are a total of 29 different codes to support the findings for Fire Safety (including drills and supportive equipment).

 

Annex C: Fire Safety Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CiC) Intensity Index Methodology

To assess the CiC Intensity Index a simple methodology has been applied based on the % share of CiC Deficiency Findings before the CiC period (namely, the Last 12 months) and the period where CiC is being applied.

The CiC corresponding Deficiency codes that are listed in Annex B (in relation to the CiC Questions) have been analysed for these periods under review (L12M before the CiC and the CiC Period).

The methodology is very simple to determine the CiC Intensity ion any port in relation with CIC related deficiency codes and findings.

The CiC Intensity Index is calculated as follows:

CIC Intensity Index = { [B – A]/A }%

A = CIC Deficiency Codes Share % (of Total Deficiencies in any given port) for the Last 12 Months (L12M), i.e. the period September 2022 till August 2023.
B = CIC Deficiency Codes Share % (of Total Deficiencies in any given port) for September & October.

Explanation and Meaning
The higher the percentage of CIC Intensity Index, the higher the focus (i.e. intensity) on the CiC related Questions and Corresponding Findings.